New Ways of Making Theatre

While doing some Internet browsing on monastic life, I came across this article on LaserMonks, the refurbished ink cartridge distribution business of the Cistercian monks of Spring Bank Abbey in Wisconsin. In the article, the Prior of the community, the Very Rev. Bernard McCoy, O.Cist., is quoted as saying that “monasteries, by the Rule of St. Benedict that we follow, are required to be self-supporting.”

I think this is a good goal for a Benedictine theatre company or religious theatre community. To that end, I have been following sites in the theatrical blogosphere that are brainstorming new ways of making theatre. One group blog site is 2amtheatre, which resulted from this late-night/early-morning Twitter conversation between several theatre artists whose blogs I read and whose opinions I respect. (You can participate on Twitter by using the hashtag #2amt.)

My favorite post on the 2amtheatre group blog is Dennis Baker‘s “A Theater Should Be Like a Bookstore.” He talks about creating a theatre that is not a commodity to be bought and sold for a set ticket price, but an experience of and for the community. The bookstore under discussion also incorporates “a café, a restau­rant, an artist’s stu­dio, and an antiques store. This cre­ates a com­mu­nity of expe­ri­ence for tourists, and through the bring­ing in of guest artists, some­thing the local com­mu­nity can return to fre­quently.” A theatre should be a place where members of the local community feel free to come and hang out, and be part of the theatre on a regular basis, not just for a couple hours on a Friday night once a month.

I’ve also been following the Prof‘s posts on his CRADLE(arts) blog. (For more information on CRADLE’s mission, go here.) I’ve really liked a couple of recent ones:

“(Netflix + YouTube) / (time = money)” looks at an alternative funding model for theatre. The idea is that, instead of charging per activity (e.g. like Blockbuster’s per rental charge), a theatre would offer a monthly membership, which would allow the member access to all the theatre’s events. Since, however, a single ensemble of theatre artists can’t themselves offer the variety of activities that make membership models like Netflix work, they would also open their space up to community organizations (like orchestras, choirs, dance troupes, art shows, etc.), which would provide the rest of the month’s events. They get free space, the members get a lot of bang for their buck, and the theatre is able to make a lot more people aware of its own shows – as well as provide the fertile soil for the growth of art in its community. Where the “(time = money)” part of the equation comes in is Scott’s idea to have participation in the arts center’s activities – whether through simple attendance or through more active participation, like creating an event – count towards the member’s next month’s membership cost. So, the more theatre (or dance or poetry slam) you see, the less you pay. The system rewards participation.

Scott’s other recent post is “The Space.” He’s a fan of Del-Tec Homes, a company which makes round modular buildings. He likes them because they’re flexible (in several ways), environmentally-friendly, and low-cost. He’s planning to apply for grant funding to build a model Del-Tec CRADLE theatre building in a community with a population of less than 25,000. (More info is in the above-linked “The Space” post.)

I encourage you to follow both the 2amtheatre and the CRADLE(arts) blogs. I promise to get on that Benedictine theatre series soon, but in the meantime, I’m pondering the membership model for my future theatre. How much would you be willing to pay to be a patron member of a theatre that was also a community arts center? $50/month? Are there similar organizations you’re aware of? If so, who are they, what do they charge? The closest practicing model I’m aware of is Stolen Chair Theatre Company‘s Community Supported Theatre. Their standard membership is $200 for a 9-month season focusing on their theme production of Quantum Poetics, which gives the member “exclusive access to every stage of Quantum Poetics’ development, from its creative retreat to its world premiere,” invitations to events like lectures, field trips, and parties, and “a discounted year-long subscription to New Scientist magazine and complimentary wine & treats at all CST events.”

Community is what’s most important with all these models. It’s also what we need to strengthen in order to combat the “artist-as-Very-Special-Person” and “Artist-as-Outsider” models (cf. Scott et al.’s discussion of these models in this post) that prevail in modern theatre education.

And it’s very Benedictine.

All-Out Geekery

As I’m writing this I’m watching Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog for at least the third time. I’m also a regular viewer of Felicia Day’s The Guild. My most major film project to date has been set in the world of Lord of the Rings fandom. And I’ve even done a vampire movie.

(Speaking of which, on my international red-eye flight last night, I finally sampled the Twilight universe in the form of the Twilight: New Moon flick. I did not become a fan. Though I am definitely on Team Jacob.)

One of the many question an actor thinks about is his brand. I don’t mind admitting that I don’t like a lot of the theatre I’ve seen, and most of what’s on T.V. I have a better hit rate with movies because I’m better able to screen what I see ahead of time. But I’m picky. A story may be skillfully executed, but if I don’t fall head-over-heels in love with the story itself, I don’t care about the execution. And besides the story, there must also be at least one character (preferably more!) whom I can love as well.

In theatre, I fall in love with plays like The World Over, A Man for All Seasons, The Crucible, and musicals like Les Misérables. In film, I fall in love with movies like The Lord of the Rings, Gladiator, Braveheart, and The Last Unicorn. In both, there tend to be intense tests of a person’s moral character set within an epic tale of good-vs-evil, often with fantastic elements.

This love of fantasy intersects with the less serious, more “squee!” fanboy side of my personality to produce an all-out love of geekery. And after watching clips about an hour ago from the Secretary of Geek Affairs Wil Wheaton‘s appearance on the T.V. show The Big Bang Theory (eliciting Khan after Khan reference), I have come to a major and freeing decision about my brand as an actor.

I’m gonna forget about “brand.” I’m just gonna be a geek.

I’m gonna go after the types of shows that make me laugh out loud with glee. Doing The FellowsHip reminded me of many of the fandoms and geek kibble I’ve been a part of and devoured, to greater or lesser degrees. Among them, in no particular order:

-Tolkien
-Narnia
-Harry Potter
-Star Trek (Picard pwns Kirk)
-Star Wars
-Monty Python
-musical theatre
-superhero movies (Batman, X-Men, Spiderman)
-Dr. Horrible
-The Guild
-games (LOTRO, M:tG, a brief trial of WoW, old school Nintendo, X-Wing flight simulators)
-performers like Wil Wheaton, Neil Patrick Harris, Felicia Day, and Patrick Stewart
-Renn faires (esp. jousting)
Society for Creative Anachronism

I’m going for all-out geekery. And also for an Inklings-tinged vision of religious theatre. Because by Jove, I love them both.

Let’s see where they take me.